dc.contributor.author | Кршиванек, Владимир | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-08T08:47:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-08T08:47:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Кршиванек, Владимир, "ЗАЩИТА НА ЛИТЕРАТУРНАТА ИСТОРИЯ. ЗА МЕТОДОЛОГИЯТА И СМИСЪЛА ОТ ПИСАНЕ НА ЛИТЕРАТУРНА ИСТОРИЯ", ПЛОВДИВСКИ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ „ПАИСИЙ ХИЛЕНДАРСКИ“ – БЪЛГАРИЯ, НАУЧНИ ТРУДОВЕ, ТОМ 49, КН. 1, СБ. Б, 2011 – ФИЛОЛОГИЯ, 89-97 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0861-0029 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://lib.uni-plovdiv.net/handle/123456789/61 | |
dc.description.abstract | The article is based on personal experience of a Czech literature historian with writing new Czech literature history. It is very difficult to create a synthetic view of literature metamorphosis of lasting validity in times that lack any universal philosophy of history, in times of unstable methodology of literature science. The essay summarises the limits of older Czech literature history, positivist and structuralist, presents new implemented project „Dějiny české literatury 1945 – 1989 (Praha, Academia 2007-8) and argues against the opinion that creating literature history is an antiquated matter. The article is a defence of the newly created methodology of literature history. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | Bulgarian | en_US |
dc.publisher | УИ "Паисий Хилендарски" | en_US |
dc.subject | history | en_US |
dc.subject | new Czech literature | en_US |
dc.subject | history of literature | en_US |
dc.subject | structuralism | en_US |
dc.subject | positivism | en_US |
dc.title | ЗАЩИТА НА ЛИТЕРАТУРНАТА ИСТОРИЯ. ЗА МЕТОДОЛОГИЯТА И СМИСЪЛА ОТ ПИСАНЕ НА ЛИТЕРАТУРНА ИСТОРИЯ | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |