dc.contributor.author | Lazareva, Viktoria | |
dc.contributor.author | Ivanova, Elena | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-13T10:02:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-13T10:02:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lazareva, Viktoria, Ivanova, Elena, "TAUTOLOGIES Х (SI) Е Х: A CORPUS-BASED INVESTIGATION", PAISII HILENDARSKI UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV – BULGARIA, RESEARCH PAPERS, VOL. 55, BOOK 1, PART В, 2017 – LANGUAGES AND LITERATURE, 223-235 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0861-0029 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://lib.uni-plovdiv.net/handle/123456789/692 | |
dc.description.abstract | The article deals with the Bulgarian tautologies X si e X and X e X, investigated on the basis of the „Bulgaria National Corpus“. The main purpose of this paper is: a) to examine the lexical features of binominative tautologies (semantic classes, frequency); b) to determine the role of the clitic si in the tautological pattern X si copula X; c) to outline the main differences between the two tautological patterns. Equative tautologies are necessarily true statements that encode the value of evidence. We affirm that in the pattern X si e X it is the modal particle si to assume the role of evidential marker. Analysis has shown that the pattern X si e X is subjected to some structural restrictions and lexical preferences, while the pattern X e X is not. We suggest that the construction X si e X, in contrast to X e X, represents a formal idiom. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | Bulgarian | en_US |
dc.publisher | УИ "Паисий Хилендарски" | en_US |
dc.subject | corpus investigation | en_US |
dc.subject | tautologies | en_US |
dc.subject | semantics | en_US |
dc.subject | clitics | en_US |
dc.title | TAUTOLOGIES Х (SI) Е Х: A CORPUS-BASED INVESTIGATION | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Х (СИ) Е Х: ТАВТОЛОГИИТЕ В СВЕТЛИНАТА НА КОРПУСНИТЕ ДАННИ | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |