MARY SHELLEY’S FRANKENSTEIN TRANSLATED: MONSTROSITY AND DEMONISATION

dc.contributor.author	Kostadinova, Vitana
dc.date.accessioned	2021-04-18T07:03:02Z
dc.date.available	2021-04-18T07:03:02Z
dc.date.issued	2019
dc.identifier.citation	Kostadinova, Vitana, "MARY SHELLEY’S FRANKENSTEIN TRANSLATED: MONSTROSITY AND DEMONISATION", PAISII HILENDARSKI UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV – BULGARIA, RESEARCH PAPERS, VOL. 57, BOOK 1, PART B, 2019 – LANGUAGES AND LITERATURE, 87-97	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0861-0029
dc.identifier.uri	https://lib.uni-plovdiv.net/handle/123456789/958
dc.description.abstract	This paper discusses Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (the 1831 edition) in view of its interpretations along the lines of monstrosity and demonisation, and how these relate to the language of the first Bulgarian translation of the novel in 1981. It touches upon the act of creation, science and the scientist, and deviation as monstrosity before it focuses on the intertextualities with Milton’s Paradise Lost and Coleridge’s Rime of the Ancient Mariner. It also elaborates on the untranslatability of cultural layers when it comes to connotations or to the ambivalent usage of words such as daemon.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	УИ "Паисий Хилендарски"	en_US
dc.subject	Mary Shelley	en_US
dc.subject	Frankenstein	en_US
dc.subject	translation	en_US
dc.subject	monster	en_US
dc.subject	monstrosity	en_US
dc.subject	daemon	en_US
dc.subject	demonisation	en_US
dc.title	MARY SHELLEY’S FRANKENSTEIN TRANSLATED: MONSTROSITY AND DEMONISATION	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US