Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndrova, Diana
dc.contributor.authorАндрова, Диана
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-12T14:12:27Z
dc.date.available2024-12-12T14:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-17
dc.identifier.issn2682-9460
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.uni-plovdiv.net/handle/123456789/1213
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses three hypotheses based on the choice between the four forms to express a negative dubitative semantics in Bulgarian. The first hypothesis examines the competition between two of these forms: nyamalo bil, ne shtyal bil. The second and the third hypotheses examine the uses of the forms nyamal bil, nyamalo bil. The study does not give a concrete answer to the question “which form is most commonly used to express a negative dubitative semantics”. As such we can conclude that the process of grammaticalization has not been completed yet.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.publisherPlovdiv University Pressen_US
dc.subjectevidentialityen_US
dc.subjectdubitativeen_US
dc.subjectverb categoryen_US
dc.subjectBulgarianen_US
dc.titleNEGATIVE FORMS OF THE DUBITATIVE FOR FUTURE SIMPLE AND FUTURE IN THE PASTen_US
dc.title.alternativeНЕГАТИВНИ ФОРМИ НА ДУБИТАТИВА ЗА БЪДЕЩЕ ВРЕМЕ И БЪДЕЩЕ ВРЕМЕ В МИНАЛОТОen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record